RESUMO Um cachorro-do-mato-vinagre (Speothos venaticus), de sete anos de idade, mantido em cativeiro, foi diagnosticado com linfoma que havia afetado os rins, as adrenais, o fígado e o baço. O animal desenvolveu insuficiência renal e foi submetido à eutanásia devido ao prognóstico desfavorável. Macroscopicamente, ambos os rins estavam aumentados de tamanho, com múltiplos nódulos. Histologicamente, a neoplasia era infiltrativa, pobremente delimitada e constituída por células redondas. Duas populações distintas foram observadas: células pequenas com morfologia linfocítica e células grandes e pleomórficas. A maior parte da população de células pequenas, correspondendo a aproximadamente 40% da população celular na neoplasia, foi positiva para CD3. As células neoplásicas foram positivas para CD45, CD11d e granzima B e negativas para CD20, CD79a, PAX5, CD163 e mieloperoxidase. Este é o primeiro caso de linfoma em um cachorro-do-mato-vinagre. Tal relado demonstra a utilidade de vários marcadores de superfície celular para o diagnóstico diferencial de tumores de células redondas nessa espécie.

ABSTRACT A captive 7-year-old male bush dog (Speothos venaticus) was diagnosed with lymphoma affecting the kidneys, adrenal glands, liver, and spleen. The animal developed renal failure and was euthanized due to poor prognosis. Grossly, both kidneys were enlarged with multiple nodules. Histologically, the neoplasm was an infiltrative and poorly demarcated round cell tumor. Two morphologically distinct cell populations were observed, smaller cells with a lymphocytic morphology, and another population of larger and pleomorphic cells. Most of the smaller cell population, approximately 40% of the population within the neoplasm, were CD3 positive. Neoplastic cells were CD45, CD11d, and granzime B positive, and negative for CD20, CD79a, PAX5, CD163, and myeloperoxidase. This is the first reported case of lymphoma in a bush dog. This report demonstrated the suitability of several cell surface markers for differential diagnosis of round cell tumors in this species.

Environmental impact assessment (EIA) in South Africa is administered by the Department of Minerals and Energy (DME) for the mining industry, and the Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (DEAT) for all other sectors. Thus far, EIA research has focused on the process under the auspices of DEAT but none has focused on the EIA process that has been mandatory in the South African mining industry since 2004. Using the Lee and Colley (Lee et al.13) review package as a basis, a review model specifically tailored to the needs of the mining industry was applied to review the quality of a sample of 20 environmental impact reports (EIRs) approved by the DME. Results reveal that 85% of the EIRs are of a satisfactory quality. Presentational and descriptive components generally achieved higher quality grades than the analytical components such as impact magnitude and alternatives. The results show that in spite of some areas of weakness, and in spite of being conducted in terms of different legislation, EIR quality in the mining sectors appears to conform to the overall standard of quality of EIRs in other sectors in South Africa, and is also on a par with quality abroad. Hence, despite the criticism that DME is usurping the role of DEAT, it is concluded that EIRs of comparable standard are being produced, and that the quality of EIRs in the mining sector do not provide supporting evidence for this criticism. However, EIR quality is only a single aspect of EIA effectiveness, others including action and implementation of EIA proposals and mitigation measures